Surgical Site Infection Rate of PDS-II and Dermabond versus Vicryl and Silk in Major Abdominal Surgery Using the Pig Liver Resection Model

Posted on

PDS-II for peritoneal and subcuticular sutures, followed by Dermabond for skin dressing was commonly used in minimal surgical field, it is still unclear whether subcuticular closure and skin dressing are effective for the major abdominal surgical incision. The purpose was to investigate SSI of PDS-II and Dermabond versus Vicryl and silk in major abdominal surgery using the pig liver resection mode. Methods: A chevron incision was performed, followed by the left hemi-hepatectomy using pig liver.

dermatology research journals

In group A, the closing of the peritoneum and subcuticular tissue were done using 1 and 3-0 PDS-II. Dermabond was used for skin dressing. In group B, closing materials were using 1-0 viclyl at peritoneal and 2-0 silk at submucosa and skin. We evaluated SSI of the skin incision in both groups. . We evaluated 7 pigs in each groups. In group A, only one of the seven pigs (14.3%) had superficial incisional SSI. In group B, Five out of seven pigs (71.4%) had deep incisional SSI and ventral hernia, and they were died within 10-14 days after surgery. Group A was significantly lower incidence of SSI than group B (P=0.03). Conclusion: PDS-II and Dermabond were effective for abdomal closing.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s